ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the sub-cellular distribution correlation between activated LIMK1 (pLIMK1Thr508) and Aurora-A in mouse oocyte meiosis,and changes in Aurora-A location and spindle structure in condition of LIMK1 inhibition.Methods Immunofluorescence staining was employed to detect the sub-cellular localization of pLIMK1Thr508and its spatial-temporal correlation with spindle organizing regulator Aurora-A in mouse oocyte meiosis; BMS-3, the specific inhibitor to LIMK1 activity, was applied to analyze the effects of LIMK1 inhibition on Aurora-A distribution and spindle formation. Results At meiotic prophase,pLIMK1Thr508was weakly detected and concentrated in the germinal vesicle(GV) in oocytes,with no signal of Aurora-A across the cytoplasm and nuclear area;as meiotic assumption approaching,pLIMK1Thr508left nuclear,aggregating as a single dense dote in the vicinity of nuclear, and being co-localized with the emerging Aurora-A; After germinal vesicle broke down (GVBD), pLIMK1Thr508and Aurora-A remained overlapped and concentrated as multi foci around the condensed chromosomes;at metaphase Ⅰ(MⅠ) and metaphase Ⅱ(MⅡ), pLIMK1Thr508was co-localized with Aurora-A on spindle poles;During anaphase Ⅰ(AⅠ) to telophase Ⅰ(Tel Ⅰ) progression, pLIMK1Thr508was detached from spindle poles and mainly concentrated on the cleavage furrow,while Aurora-A loosely congressed on spindle. In ad-dition, LIMK1 inhibition with BMS- 3 destroyed Aurora-A polar location and spindle formation. Conclusions pLIMK1Thr508is a microtubule organizing center (MTOC)-associated protein, may participate in spindle assembly and maintenance through regulating Aurora-A in mouse oocytes during meiotic progression.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate clinical results of implant-supported complete denture of 12 patients with severe chronic periodontitis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>After systematically periodontic treatment and controlling the inflammation, 12 cases with severe chronic periodontitis were extracted the residual teeth and received immediate implant placement. The implant-supported complete dentures were finished at 5 or 6 months after operation. Restorative results were evaluated with clinical examination, radiological examination and chief complaints of the patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 108 implants were placed into 20 dental arches, including 37 immediate implants. Average loading was for 3 years and all implants were stable. Progressive bone resorption was observed around two implants. The average bone resorption of other peri-implants was (1.33 +/- 0.10) mm. The implant survival rate was 98.1%. The immediate implant survival rate was 97.3%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>After periodontic treatment, the patients with severe chronic periodontitis could be restored using immediate implant placement and implant-supported complete denture. It can shorten the treatment period, reduce absorption of alveolar and obtain a favorable result by oral health care.</p>
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Critical Illness , Dental Implantation , Denture, Complete , Follow-Up Studies , Periodontitis , General SurgeryABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the clinical stability of the palatal implant anchorage system in orthodontic treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Sixteen osseointegrated implants (5.0 mm in diameter, 6 mm length) were inserted in the median palatal suture area of 19 patients with malocclusion (average age: 18.22 +/- 7.10 years, from 11 years to 35 years 1 month) as anchorage of active orthodontic treatment with MBT appliance. The standard lateral cephalogram after implant placement and before implant removing was taken to compare the radiological parameters.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The successful rate of palatal implant anchorage was 84.2%. The average duration of 16 palatal implant was 23.08 +/- 8.06 months (from 10 months to 36 months). There were no statistical differences in all parameters from the implant placement to the end of treatment. IL-X was from (62.88 +/- 5.85) mm to (62.45 +/- 6.70) mm, IL-Y was from (36.66 +/- 5.41) mm to (37.96 +/- 4.90) mm, IAP-PP was from (73.81 +/- 8.84) degrees to (74.72 +/- 9.22) degrees, IAP-Y was from (62.09 +/- 9.33) degrees to (63.85 +/- 10.96) degrees, U6-Y is from (20.80 +/- 5.87) mm to (21.49 +/- 6.00) mm.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Stable palatal implant anchorage was maintained during active orthodontic treatment.</p>